Friday, April 24, 2009

GE's incestuous relationship with Obama

Everyone needs to boycott GE!

GE owns majority share of NBC UNIVERSAL "Formed in May 2004 through the combining of NBC and Vivendi Universal Entertainment, NBC Universal owns and operates a valuable portfolio of news and entertainment networks, a premier motion picture company, significant television production operations, a leading television stations group, and world-renowned theme parks. NBC Universal is 80% owned by General Electric and 20% owned by Vivendi." NBC UNIVERSAL TELEVISION GROUP is NBC, MSNBC and Telemundo, NBC News also includes "NBC Mobile provides news and information updates and show excerpts to cell phone users throughout the day reported by the anchors and correspondents of NBC News, and NBC News Radio produces up-to-the-minute radio reports for affiliated stations in all major markets across the country."

NBC Owns and Operates TV Stations in major cities all over the country;
WNBC (NBC4 New York), KNBC (NBC4 Los Angeles), WMAQ (NBC5 Chicago), WCAU (NBC10 Philadelphia), KNTV (NBC3 San Jose/San Fransisco),
KXAS (NBC5 Dallas/Fort Worth), WRC (NBC4 Washington), WTVJ (NBC6 Miami), KNSD (NBC7/39 San Diego), WVIT (NBC30 Hartford),

GE though their holdings in NBC promoted the election of Obama. It has come to my attention (Glenn Beck) that not only is GE a major producer of CFL (Compact florescent Light bulbs), but they also are the major producer of wind turbines and have a major stake in "Carbon Credits". If Obama pass all his Green Energy and Cap and Trade plans GE will stand to make billions.

Obama is quoted as saying on Earth day "He pushed personal responsibility, calling on every American to replace one incandescent light bulb with one compact fluorescent. The president also said the leaders of the world's major economies will meet next week to discuss the energy crisis."

For his remarks, Obama chose Iowa, second only to Texas in installed wind capacity.

He announced his administration is creating the nation's first program to authorize offshore projects to generate electricity from wind turbines and ocean currents. The Interior Department on Wednesday issued the long-awaited regulations governing how leases will be issued for the development of such energy sources and how revenue will be shared with coastal states."

Obama talks up wind power, green jobs on Earth Day

Obama advisers express support for Democrats energy bill

Will General Electric Get Paid for Supporting President Obama?   The O'Reilly Factor   talking points.

GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt says Obama's stimulus plan will work

The chief executive of General Electric Co Jeffrey Immel is on Obama's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, meant to provide outside-the-Beltway input to the president!!!!

GE, NBC & Obama Ties

GE Reports   Obama spotlights GE wind partners on Earth Day

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Napolitano must go!

I just signed a petition demanding the resignation or removal
of DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano. Napolitano's Department of
Homeland Security issued a report that profiled conservatives
as a terror threat. The report even singled out pro-life
citizens and those who oppose illegal immigration, in
addition to members of the military.

Please join with me in signing by going here:

See the Report PDF

She has also embarrassed our country while visiting Canada recently, saying the 9/11 terrorist came from there when they didn't. She sucks on border issues and She sucked as the Arizona governor and we are thrilled she is gone but not before she bankrupted the state.. She only has a job because she supported Obama over our state Senator McCain. She isn't qualified to be dog catcher and certainly isn't qualified to be head of our National Security. She is as leftist as Obama is but she is way dumber.. She MUST GO!!

Fire Janet Napolitano!

Remember if any one or more of the following applies, YOU could be branded a terrorist or extremist and
subject to "scrutiny" by federal, state and local police if:
You believe in the 2nd Amendment
You believe in the right to life
You believe in the right to free speech
You are a veteran who honorably served your country
You believe in the right to peaceably assemble
You desire that your government not waste YOUR money
You believe you pay enough taxes already
You are a returning member of the military who risked your life for your country
You desire the laws of our land be ENFORCED and our BORDERS SECURED!
You are of the Jewish or Christian faith and believe the government should protect against radical Islamic fundamentalists who desire to kill you and other Americans
You believe those who violate the law should NOT be rewarded with YOUR tax dollars


Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Gird Your Blogs!

Got this from World Net Daily the other day.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: WorldNetDaily

Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:40 AM
Subject: The Internet's Greatest Threat
To: Scott

A Free Press For A Free People
Gird Your Blogs!
Under "Cybersecurity", Congress Will Be the Internet's Greatest Threat!

By Brad O'Leary

Gird your blogs, because if liberals in Congress get their way,
President Obama will have sole discretionary authority to shut down
the Internet or critical parts of the Internet should he feel his
presidency is being tested. Worse, under the guise of cybersecurity,
Obama will essentially be granted the power to destroy free speech on
the web.

On April 1st of this year, Senators Rockefeller, Snowe, Bayh and
Nelson introduced bills S. 773 and S.778, collectively called the
Cybersecurity Act, which would give President Obama dictatorial power
over the Internet during a time of national crisis or emergency.

All of the bills' sponsors voted for the Bipartisan Campaign Reform
Act of 2002 that prohibited organizations and individuals from running
advocacy ads against candidates 60 days in advance of a general
election. Now it seems these same people have conjured up a gag order
for the Internet.

According to the current drafts, under the Cyber Security Act of 2009
the President may "declare a cybersecurity emergency and order the
limitation or shut down of Internet traffic to and from any comprised
federal government or United States critical infrastructure
information system or network". He may also "order the disconnection
of any Federal Government or United States critical infrastructure
information systems or networks in the interest of national security."

What constitutes "cybersecurity emergency" or "critical infrastructure
information system or network" is left completely up to the President
to define. We know that the Administration, according to Rahm Emanuel,
never wants "a serious crisis to go to waste". We also know the
Administration supports the regulation of free speech on the Internet.

President Obama's choice to lead the powerful Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs is none other than Cass Sunstein, a radical
Harvard law professor and supporter of the Fairness Doctrine for the
Internet. According to Sunstein, "A system of limitless individual
choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the
interest of citizenship and self-government."

Obama campaign fundraiser and FCC Chair nominee, Julius Genachowski,
is a supporter of "Net neutrality", the first step in applying the
Fairness Doctrine to the Internet.

"Net neutrality" proponents like Genachowski would have government
decide what content Internet operators and network owners must
provide. Incredibly, they claim this is to keep the Internet free and
open to all, when in reality, their goal is to usher the heavy hands
of federal regulators into the tent.

Stifling any venue where ideology competes with left-wing mainstream
media has always been a goal of the left and Obama. Obama has just
been more evasive in his means by supporting policies such as "net
neutrality" and wobbling on the reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine
to talk radio. Liberal members of Congress are now set on sending
America on an unconstitutional b-line away from Uncle Sam and directly
to Big Brother.

The Cybersecurity Act is also includes a provision where "The
Department of Commerce shall serve as the clearinghouse of
cybersecuirty threat and vulnerability information to the Federal
Government and private sector owned (emphasis mine) critical
infrastructure information systems and networks." Shelving all privacy
laws including the requirement for warrants, the Secretary of Commerce
"shall have access to all relevant data concerning such networks
without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule or policy
restricting such access." Senator Rockefeller made it clear in his
statement what "relevant data" this act could include when he stated
"We must protect our critical infrastructure at all costs ­ from our
water to our electricity, to banking, traffic lights and electronic
health records ­ the list goes on."

While we have worried about cyber attacks from Russia and China, who
would have thought the greatest threat would come from members of our
own Congress.

More by This Author
Shut Up, America!
The End of Free Speech

By Brad O'Leary

In Shut Up, America! The End of Free Speech, Brad O'Leary shines light
on a dark mission of the left, shutting down conservative voices ­
and, in the process, eviscerating the First Amendment.

Brad O'Leary exposes the agenda and the strategy behind the plan --
how Congress and the president will rationalize the changes using the
language of "diversity" and "fairness" and "tolerance." He also
addresses how the impending legislation and regulations will doubly
impact Christian talk radio -- and eventually every other form of
communication in America.

While supplies last, every copy of Shut Up, America! purchased from
WorldNetDaily will be autographed by Brad O'Leary!

Get Your Signed Copy of "Shut Up, America!" Now

"If you want to see the blueprint for the plot to silence talk radio,
this is it," says Joseph Farah, founder of WorldNetDaily and WND
Books. "How important is this? If you want to see the people in charge in Washington remain there perpetually, ignore this threat. The plot to end free speech and the free press in America is the ultimate incumbent protection plan."

About the Author:

Brad O'Leary is chairman of PM Direct Marketing and a former NBC
Westwood One talk-show host. He is the author of 11 books, including
last year's bestseller, The Audacity of Deceit: Barack Obama's War on
American Values.

WorldNetDaily | 2020 Pennsylvania Ave NW, #351 | Washington, DC 20006

Copyright 1997-2009 Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Bookmark and Share

Global Warming & Earth day

One of my favorite sites to visit every day ticked me off last night

Astronomy Picture of the Day 4/21/09 was about global warming and they said:
"How much will the Earth's surface warm up over the lives of our children? No one is sure. Compared to the past 100 million years, the Earth is currently enduring a relative cold spell, possibly about four degrees Celsius below average. Over the past 100 years, however, data indicate the average global temperature of the Earth has increased by nearly one degree Celsius."

Lets analyze this sentence which is written by two Astrophysicis (since when was climate their area of expertise?). First it states Earth is currently experiencing a cold spell compared to the last 100 mission years. Also you should know we have been cooling the last few years and have experienced very cold winter. Here in Phoenix we've had freezing temperatures in December when we normally don't freeze at all. Two winters ago we had a record cold snap for a few days that froze and killed trees, plants all over the valley and froze plumbing all over.

Next they tell us we are having global warming because the average had increased by "nearly 1 degree Celsius" which is 9/5ths of a Fahrenheit degree, or 1 degree Celsius = 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit. So the average over the last 100 years has gone up less than 2 degrees Fahrenheit.

To convert from Celsius to Fahrenheit, first multiply by 180/100, then add 32
To convert from Fahrenheit to Celsius, first subtract 32, then multiply by 100/180

What they haven't told you is we have only had accurate records about that long and how accurate they are is debatable. Or that there are 31,478 American scientists who have signed the Global Warming Petition Project which states they are "convinced that the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity and that government action on the basis of this hypothesis would unnecessarily and counter productively damage both human prosperity and the natural environment of the Earth." They have a 12 page article on why Global warming isn't science.. (html 150-dpi PDF, 300-dpi PDF, or 600-dpi PDF)


A review of the research literature concerning the environmental consequences of increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide leads to the conclusion that increases during the 20th and early 21st centuries have produced no deleterious effects upon Earth's weather and climate. Increased carbon dioxide has, however, markedly increased plant growth. Predictions of harmful climatic effects due to future increases in hydrocarbon use and minor greenhouse gases like CO2 do not conform to current experimental knowledge. The environmental effects of rapid expansion of the nuclear and hydrocarbon energy industries are discussed."

Or that the a good number of the stations that provide the data aren't properly sited and give very bad readings.

Ponder the Maunder
Pain in Maine, but they can measure rain
How not to measure temperature, part 22
Surface Stations, Climate Stations records and Surveys

Harmful Man Induced Climate Change Refuted
The Global Warming Hoax
Global Climate Scam

The Global warming scare isn't about "saving the planet or mankind" It is about power, money and control over YOU. The people who are pushing it are either dupes of the people pushing it or the ones who are making the money on it and want power and control. GE which owns NBC through them other media outlets is the biggest producer of CFL lights and lobbied congress to ban regular light bulbs. Gore who is a hypocrite and sells carbon credits. There are many others but I don't have time to research them.

Temperatures dropping, fewer hurricanes, arctic ice growing, polar bear population up -WorldnetDaily

Scott's World Home page
Scott's Weather Station
Scott's Weather Underground Member page

Scott's website
Scott Blog

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Obama Pushing Treaty To Ban Reloading

Obama Pushing Treaty To Ban Reloading
-- Even BB guns could be on the chopping block

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Remember CANDIDATE Barack Obama? The guy who "wasn't going to take away
our guns"?

Well, guess what?

Less than 100 days into his administration, he's never met a gun he
didn't hate.

A week ago, Obama went to Mexico, whined about the United States, and
bemoaned (before the whole world) the fact that he didn't have the
political power to take away our semi-automatics. Nevertheless, that
didn't keep him from pushing additional restrictions on American gun

It's called the Inter-American Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing
of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other
Related Materials. To be sure, this imponderable title masks a really
nasty piece of work.

First of all, when the treaty purports to ban the "illicit" manufacture
of firearms, what does that mean?

1. "Illicit manufacturing" of firearms is defined as "assembly of
firearms [or] ammunition... without a license...."

Hence, reloading ammunition -- or putting together a lawful firearm from
a kit -- is clearly "illicit manufacturing."

Modifying a firearm in any way would surely be "illicit manufacturing."
And, while it would be a stretch, assembling a firearm after cleaning it
could, in any plain reading of the words, come within the screwy
definition of "illicit manufacturing."

2. "Firearm" has a similarly questionable definition.

"[A]ny other weapon" is a "firearm," according to the treaty -- and the
term "weapon" is nowhere defined.

So, is a BB gun a "firearm"? Probably.

A toy gun? Possibly.

A pistol grip or firing pin? Probably. And who knows what else.

If these provisions (and others) become the law of the land, the Obama
administration could have a heyday in enforcing them. Consider some of
the other provisions in the treaty:

* Banning Reloading. In Article IV of the treaty, countries commit to
adopting "necessary legislative or other measures" to criminalize
illicit manufacturing and trafficking in firearms.

Remember that "illicit manufacturing" includes reloading and modifying
or assembling a firearm in any way. This would mean that the Obama
administration could promulgate regulations banning reloading on the
basis of this treaty -- just as it is currently circumventing Congress
to write legislation taxing greenhouse gases.

* Banning Gun Clubs. Article IV goes on to state that the criminalized
acts should include "association or conspiracy" in connection with said
offenses -- which is arguably a term broad enough to allow, by
regulation, the criminalization of entire pro-gun organizations or gun
clubs, based on the facilities which they provide their membership.

* Extraditing US Gun Dealers. Article V requires each party to "adopt
such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the
offenses it has established in accordance with this Convention" under a
variety of circumstances.

We know that Mexico is blaming U.S. gun dealers for the fact that its
streets are flowing with blood. And we know it is possible for Mexico
to define offenses "committed in its territory" in a very broad way.
And we know that we have an extradition obligation under Article XIX of
the proposed treaty. So we know that Mexico could try to use the treaty
to demand to extradition of American gun dealers.

Under Article XXIX, if Mexico demands the extradition of a lawful
American gun dealer, the U.S. would be required to resolve the dispute
through "other means of peaceful settlement."

Does anyone want to risk twenty years in a sweltering Mexican jail on
the proposition that the Obama administration would apply this provision
in a pro-gun manner?

* Microstamping. Article VI requires "appropriate markings" on
firearms. And, it is not inconceivable that this provision could be
used to require microstamping of firearms and/or ammunition -- a
requirement which is clearly intended to impose specifications which are
not technologically possible or which are possible only at a
prohibitively expensive cost.

* Gun Registration. Article XI requires the maintenance of any records,
for a "reasonable time," that the government determines to be necessary
to trace firearms. This provision would almost certainly repeal
portions of McClure-Volkmer and could arguably be used to require a
national registry or database.

ACTION: Write your Senators and urge them to oppose the Inter-American
Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms,
Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials.

Please use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at to send your Senators the
pre-written e-mail message below.

----- Pre-written letter -----

Dear Senator:

I am urging you, in the strongest terms, to oppose the Inter-American
Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms,
Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials.

This anti-gun treaty was written by international bureaucrats who are
either stupid or virulently anti-gun -- or both.

This treaty could very well ban the ability to reload ammunition, to put
new stocks on rifles lawfully owned by American citizens, and, possibly,
even ban BB guns!

There are too many problems with this treaty to mention them all in this
letter. The rest can be read on the website of Gun Owners of America

Please do not tell me the treaty has not yet been abused in this way by
the bevy of Third World countries which have signed it. We do not
expect the real ramifications of the treaty to become clear until the
big prize -- the U.S. -- has stepped into the trap.

For all of these reasons, I must insist that you oppose ratification of
the treaty.



What's Your Current GOA Status?

Obviously, we now face years of invigorated attacks on our gun rights.
Shutting down gun shows, prohibitions on specific calibers, another
semi-auto ban, and the anti-gun extremists' Holy Grail of mandatory
federal licensing and registration of all gun owners -- these are just
some of the horrors that we already know we'll have to defeat head-on.
Not to mention this treaty nonsense. Meanwhile, we'll take every
opportunity to go on offense and advance the Second Amendment.

It can't be done without every single voice being counted. That's why
we are asking you to consider making the commitment of becoming a Gun
Owners of America Life Member. By doing so, you put the politicians on
notice that neither you nor GOA is going away -- that no matter who's in
the White House, there is always going to be a solid wall of resistance.

Now is a perfect time to become a Life Member. And if you aren't a GOA
member at all, isn't it time you became one?

Please go to to upgrade your
participation in GOA.


Please do not reply directly to this message, as your reply will
bounce back as undeliverable.

To subscribe to free, low-volume GOA alerts, go to on the web. Change of e-mail
address may also be made at that location.

To unsubscribe send a message to with the word unsubscribe in
the subject line or use the url below.

Problems, questions or comments? The main GOA e-mail address is at your disposal. Please do not add that
address to distribution lists sending more than ten messages per
week or lists associated with issues other than gun rights.

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, April 09, 2009

Watch this CNN anti-gun YouTube video and SAF's rebutal

Watch this CNN anti-gun YouTube video and SAF's rebutal

Watch the YouTube link below to see CNN anti-gun rights bias and my on air knock out punch to them.

YouTube - CNN Rick Sanchez 'SLAMS' FOX News's Gun Fear Mongering with guest Alan Gottlieb of the Second Amendment Foundation.

With your help we can make this the most watched video on YouTube.

Thanks for all your help and support in protecting our right to keep and bear arms.

Sincerely yours,

Alan M. Gottlieb
Founder, Second Amendment Foundation

< Please e-mail, distribute, and circulate to friends and family >

Copyright © 2009 Second Amendment Foundation, All Rights Reserved.
Second Amendment Foundation
James Madison Building
12500 N.E. Tenth Place
Bellevue, WA 98005
Voice: 425-454-7012
Toll Free: 800-426-4302
FAX: 425-451-3959

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, April 07, 2009

Millions of Illegal Aliens to Get Amnesty!

Vote Below:
Keep 'Dream Act' Amnesty Dead
I FAVOR Illegal
Alien Amnesties

Help Us Keep the "Dream Act" Dead

Sen. Durbin Brings Back His Disastrous 'Dream Act'!
Millions of Illegal Aliens to Get Amnesty!

Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) has once again BROUGHT BACK his dreadful 'Dream Act' to amnesty illegal aliens under the age of 35 who have been in the country for the last five years!

The 'Dream Act' would allow this group of illegal aliens to receive citizenship and be eligible for in-state tuition rates at public universities. This disastrous proposal will also make illegal aliens eligible for federal student loans and federal work-study programs, another benefit that any law-abiding foreign and U.S.-born students cannot receive ALL AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE.

Why would Sen. Durbin reintroduce a policy that has already been shunned by Congress and America?

STOP New Illegal Alien Amnesty
I FAVOR Illegal
Alien Amnesties

(When you Click Your Answer above, you'll be taken to a web page
where you will see INSTANT RESULTS. You will also be able to take action if you wish.)

Join with 900,220 citizens who make their voices heard through
NumbersUSA, America's largest-member immigration-reduction organization.
We are non-profit and non-partisan.

Numbers USA
1601 N. Kent Street
Suite 1100
Arlington, VA 22209

Bookmark and Share

uTube videos on freedom and the future

Bookmark and Share

Monday, April 06, 2009

Petition to Harry Reid -- Sign now!

April 6, 2009

Dear NAGR supporter:

"There are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to reinstitute the ban on the sale of assault weapons."

Barack Obama's anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder didn't exactly surprise gun owners when he came clean about his plans to ram through a new "Assault Weapons" ban into law.

But today, with the White House and Congress chock full of anti-gunners, Barack Obama and his anti-gun Attorney General don't just want the "same old ban."

They want a PERMANENT ban expanded to include almost any semi-automatic firearm in America!

That's why it's vital you sign the online petition we've prepared for our members, which demands that Senator Harry Reid refuse to allow so much as a hearing on the "Assault Weapons" Ban -- TODAY!

You see, an "assault weapon" could be virtually any gun.

The anti-gun politicians just like the term "assault weapons" because it sounds "scary."

And some people get them confused with fully automatic select-fire "machine guns" -- guns that have been tightly controlled since 1934.

So Sarah Brady and the gun grabbers think they've got it made.  They believe all they have to do is call a gun an "assault weapon" to demonize it, and then pass a ban.

That's why we must fight back NOW!

The only good news in this situation is that we DO have a real chance of stopping this bill. 

You see, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is THE KEY to defeating any new "Assault Weapons" Ban. 

All he has to do is REFUSE to allow any Senate action on the bill, and no ban will get passed.

He's already said he plans on voting against a new ban "if it comes up for a vote."

Great, but not good enough, Harry.

 That's why you and I need to make sure Senator Harry Reid knows that if he allows the ban to have so much as a hearing, he will lose his seat.

And believe me: That's a threat Senator Reid will take seriously.

He's already disliked by a majority of Nevadans -- and insiders are calling Senator Reid the most vulnerable Democrat in the Senate.

If Senator Reid crosses gun owners, he's political dead meat -- plain and simple.  It's our job to make sure he knows it.

But remember, Senator Reid doesn't need our votes to win reelection -- he needs the votes of folks in Nevada.

So -- in addition to your signed petition -- you and I must do everything we can to mobilize Second Amendment supporters in Nevada.

And that's good news!

 Firstly, Nevada is one of the most pro-gun states in the country.

And secondly, this program will give you and me an incredible "bang for our buck."

Instead of mobilizing folks all over the country to try and get 41 votes to filibuster the gun grabbers' schemes, we can concentrate all our firepower in ONE state.

And Nevada just happens to be one of the least populated states in the country -- their TOTAL population is just under 2.5 million.

That means the National Association for Gun Rights can run the kind of no-nonsense, no-compromise grassroots effort that will have Senator Reid running for the hills.

 But of course, even a targeted statewide program like this won't be cheap.

So in addition to your petition , I hope I can count on your financial support as well.

With your generous contribution, we'll focus our resources on running a full-scale campaign to mobilize Nevada gun owners, including:

  • Sending out three massive statewide mailings, urging Nevada gun owners to contact Senator Reid and express their opposition to the ban.
  • Writing hard-hitting guest editorials for every daily and weekly newspaper in Nevada to explain to Nevadans that Senator Reid has the power to single-handedly stop any new "Assault Weapons" Ban.
  • Training in-state pro-gun activists to write letters to the editor, work the talk-radio shows, talk to the press and hand out flyers at EVERY ONE of Senator Reid's in-state events.
  • Putting up anti-BAN billboards within eyesight of EVERY one of Senator Reid's Nevada offices, demanding that Senator Reid refuse to allow so much as a hearing on the ban.
  • Running statewide newspaper, radio and TV ads to show Senator Reid we really mean business.

The truth of the matter is, this simple statewide program in Nevada has the potential to be the most important program ANY gun rights group runs this year.

 And if we can stop the so-called "Assault Weapons" Ban from passing, we just may be able to stop anything the gun control crowd throws our way.

But without an IMMEDIATE influx of funds, we may not be able to take advantage of this opportunity.

And if we don't, a new, permanent "Assault Weapons" Ban WILL become law.

I'm sure, like me, you can hardly stomach that thought.

That's why, in addition to your signed petition to Senator Reid, I also hope you'll agree to make a generous contribution of $100 or $200 to the National Association for Gun Rights.  Click here to contribute.

Believe me, I know that's a lot, but we have an opportunity here to make a major difference.

If you can't afford $100, please consider contributing $75 or $50 to the cause.

Listen: If you and I show Senator Reid that he could lose his seat if he allows action on any new gun ban, we can win.  It's that simple.

So please sign and the online petition, and rush me your most generous contribution of $200, $100, or $50 TODAY.


Dudley Brown
Executive Director

P.S. We need to make sure Senator Harry Reid knows you and I -- and tens of thousands of Nevadans -- aren't going to let him get away with allowing a new, permanent "Assault Weapons" Ban to pass.

So please sign NAGR's online petition to Harry Reid demanding that he refuse to allow so much as a hearing on the "Assault Weapons" Ban TODAY!

And in addition to your signed petition, please send a generous contribution of $200, $100, or $50 -- or whatever you can afford -- TODAY! Click here to contribute.

Help fight gun control. Donate to the National Association for Gun Rights!

Forward this message to a friend »   | 
View as a web page »


Bookmark and Share